{"id":606,"date":"2018-04-27T23:30:52","date_gmt":"2018-04-28T03:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/?p=606"},"modified":"2023-05-06T16:58:48","modified_gmt":"2023-05-06T20:58:48","slug":"snobs-versus-slobs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/?p=606","title":{"rendered":"Snobs versus Slobs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The title to this month\u2019s blog is borrowed from that wonderful comedy from 1980 <em>Caddyshack<\/em>, which is itself an homage to the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Commedia_dell%27arte\">old commedia dell\u2019arte<\/a> style of theater.\u00a0 The title seemed apt for two reasons.\u00a0 First, the subject of this blog is the economics of theater art.\u00a0 Second, the interest lies in the tension between the relatively new, digital medium of streaming, playing the role of the snobs and the more venerable method of motion pictures, or movies, if you prefer, as the snobs.<\/p>\n<p>This particular instance in the classic confrontation between old and new pits the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cannes_Film_Festival\">Cannes Film Festival<\/a> against <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Netflix\">Netflix<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Slobs_v_Snobs.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Slobs_v_Snobs.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"857\" height=\"327\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-605\" srcset=\"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Slobs_v_Snobs.jpg 857w, https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Slobs_v_Snobs-300x114.jpg 300w, https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Slobs_v_Snobs-768x293.jpg 768w, https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Slobs_v_Snobs-810x309.jpg 810w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 857px) 100vw, 857px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve been a Netflix customer for nearly 20 years, having sign-up for a membership sometime in 1998 and I\u2019ve always liked the idea of DVDs arriving in the mail with movies for what passes for the big screen in my home.\u00a0 In the intervening years, Netflix evolved under its own success and moved away from \u2018rentals\u2019 and into streaming and generating their own content (as an aside, I question the logic of these moves, from a business standpoint, but it\u2019s their business model).\u00a0 As a result, Netflix now finances and makes their own motion pictures, which neatly brings us to the Cannes Film Festival.<\/p>\n<p>The first Cannes Film Festival was held in 1946 and in the 70 some odd years since then it has grown in international standing and acclaim.\u00a0 Movie makers from all over the world covet the Palme d\u2019Or (gold palm) award.\u00a0 The festival has accumulated a great deal of both financial and reputational capital making it a large player in the entertainment economy.<\/p>\n<p>On the surface there seems to be a perfect match between Netflix and Cannes \u2013 a marriage made in media heaven.\u00a0 On one hand, Netflix is making movies while, on the other hand, Cannes is seeking movies to exhibit.\u00a0 What could go wrong?<\/p>\n<p>Well, as the recent article from the NY Daily News (<em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/entertainment\/movies\/netflix-films-no-longer-compete-cannes-film-festival-article-1.3894935\">Netflix films can no longer compete at Cannes Film Festival<\/a><\/em>, by Rachel Desantis 3\/25\/2018) reports, Cannes is unwilling to allow Netflix movies to take home that golden palm branch.\u00a0 A key quote from the article makes Cannes position abundantly clear<\/p>\n<div class = \"myQuoteDiv\">\nThe Netflix people loved the red carpet and would like to be present with other films. But they understand that the intransigence of their own model is now the opposite of ours.<\/p>\n<div class = \"myAttrib\">-Thierry Fremaux, Cannes Film Festival<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>The use of the word \u2018intransigence\u2019 is most telling.\u00a0 What kind of exact intransigence is Fremaux reacting to?\u00a0 The fact that Netflix prefers to exclusively stream its content rather than show it in theaters.\u00a0 As discussed in Desantis\u2019s article<\/p>\n<div class = \"myQuoteDiv\">\n\u2026Netflix attempted to screen the films in France for a few days ahead of the festival, but were unable to due to the country's \"strict chronology laws.\"\u2026 Cannes now requires movies to have some sort of theatrical release in France, barring Netflix from eligibility.<\/div>\n<p>In a nutshell, Netflix\u2019s movie making may be compatible with Cannes\u2019s role as exhibitor, but the rest of Netflix that also acts as distributor and theater owner is a direct threat to movie houses all across France and the rest of the world, for that matter.<\/p>\n<p>There also seems to be a big government component thwarting Netflix in its chance to earn the Palme d\u2019Or, as the \u2018strict chronology laws\u2019 listed in the piece seem to exist as a regulatory hurdle for alternative media or, perhaps, simply as a protection for French film regardless of the source.\u00a0 Nonetheless, the presence of governmental protection lurking in the background is a bad sign.<\/p>\n<p>Desantis\u2019s article goes on to quote Fremaux as saying:<\/p>\n<div class = \"myQuoteDiv\">\nWe have to take into account the existence of these powerful new players: Amazon, Netflix and maybe soon Apple,\" Fremaux said. \"(But) Cinema (still) triumphs everywhere even in this golden age of series. The history of cinema and the history of the internet are two different things.<\/p>\n<div class = \"myAttrib\">-Thierry Fremaux, Cannes Film Festival<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>What we see from Cannes is classic economic snobbery of the kind that spelled the undoing of Kodak (see <em><a href=\"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/?p=92\">How Kodak Went So Wrong<\/a><\/em>).\u00a0 Fremaux\u2019s focus seems to be on the how:\u00a0 record on photographic film, edit and post-produce, distribute to theaters, and have the masses watch together at proscribed times.\u00a0 He should be focused on the what:\u00a0 a good story told in a good way, regardless of how it is consumed.<\/p>\n<p>Consider a similar exchange from <em>Singing in the Rain<\/em> (not only a fine musical but also a very funny and honest critique of the motion picture industry)<\/p>\n<p><center><div style=\"width: 720px;\" class=\"wp-video\"><!--[if lt IE 9]><script>document.createElement('video');<\/script><![endif]-->\n<video class=\"wp-video-shortcode\" id=\"video-606-1\" width=\"720\" height=\"480\" preload=\"metadata\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"video\/mp4\" src=\"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Lotta-Dumb-Show.mp4?_=1\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Lotta-Dumb-Show.mp4\">https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Lotta-Dumb-Show.mp4<\/a><\/video><\/div><\/center><\/p>\n<p><P>To drive this point home, imagine if you asked a friend what he thought about a novel and his response centered on criticism of the page size, the font, and the binding.\u00a0 He then moves on to criticize audio versions of the same work since they fail to give the reader the same experience as turning pages.\u00a0 At the end of this rant, you are still left asking \u2018yes but how was the book!\u2019, by which you mean \u2018tell me about the story.\u2019<\/P><\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m certain that behind closed doors at Cannes, Fremaux and his colleagues scoffed at the pretentious Netflix as the members of Monumental Pictures scoffed at the idea of \u2018talkies\u2019 in this clip (also from <em>Singing in the Rain<\/em>):<\/p>\n<p><center><div style=\"width: 720px;\" class=\"wp-video\"><video class=\"wp-video-shortcode\" id=\"video-606-2\" width=\"720\" height=\"480\" preload=\"metadata\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"video\/mp4\" src=\"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Its-Vulgar.mp4?_=2\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Its-Vulgar.mp4\">https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Its-Vulgar.mp4<\/a><\/video><\/div><\/center><\/p>\n<p><P>I wonder if Cannes will be laughing a decade from now.<\/P><\/p>\n<p>Final Note:  After the drafting of this post, Netflix racheted up the ante in their showdown with Cannes, by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hollywoodreporter.com\/news\/netflix-threatens-withhold-films-cannes-festival-1100244\">threatening to withdraw their movies<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The title to this month\u2019s blog is borrowed from that wonderful comedy from 1980 Caddyshack, which is itself an homage to the old commedia dell\u2019arte style of theater.\u00a0 The title... <a class=\"read-more-button\" href=\"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/?p=606\">Read more &gt;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=606"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/606\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1189,"href":"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/606\/revisions\/1189"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commoncents.blogwyrm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}